In this release, the main Interpretation windows share a common user interface with SKUA-GOCAD, for more efficient work. Integration between interpretation and modeling applications has been extended in Paradigm 18. It enables users to easily switch between different combinations of any of the above through a simple one-step mechanism, and to share their data selections easily with colleagues. This new functionality groups together user selections of well data activity, marker priority, and assignment, with the Epos Formation Table. Paradigm 18 introduces a “Stratigraphic Context” for a variety of interpretation activities. The Integrated Canvas is complemented with new high-resolution workflows for interval seismic, Spectral Decomposition, and Dip Steered Enhancement attributes. In Paradigm 18, further enhancements have been made to the Integrated Canvas released in Paradigm® 17, that consolidates the core SeisEarth interpretation windows (3D Canvas, BaseMap, and Section) into a single application. This gives Paradigm users another way to access our products, and makes it easier than ever for remote teams to work together. Accessibility and collaboration are optimized through support for applications running on the Cloud. A new parameter sensitivity analysis has been introduced in this release to facilitate user understanding of the impact of parameter changes on several interpretation workflows. Geobody detection has been integrated into the SeisEarth interpretation solution suite and can be applied to the results of the seismic facies classification. WAM Web Asset Manager This release uses Machine Learning as a data integrator and process automation tool, and introduces new solutions for the unsupervised classification of prestack and poststack seismic data.Sysdrill® Designer Embedded Well Planning.Stratimagic® Seismic Facies Classification.SKUA-GOCAD™ High-Definition Earth Modeling.SeisEarth® Multi-Survey Interpretation.QSI (Probe®/Vanguard®) AVO Analysis, Seismic Inversion, and Property Determination.GeoSec® 2D 2D Geological Structural Restoration.GeoDepth® Velocity Modeling and Imaging.EarthStudy 360® Full-Azimuth Imaging and Characterization.The following products are included in Paradigm 18:
#Rokdoc crossplot full#
The final interpretation may be used to rank targets, optimize drilling campaigns, and ultimately improve production.Emerson’s Paradigm® 18 provides a next-generation platform that includes new applications for advanced automation using machine learning methods, enhanced integration across the full range of Paradigm solutions, more effective collaboration, with applications running on the Cloud, and optimization of processes and workflows, including high-resolution seismic processing, imaging and modeling, that improve image and earth model accuracy. Seismic reservoir characterization results are critical in constraining landing zones and trajectories of the horizontal wells.
#Rokdoc crossplot driver#
To complete the characterization of the intervals of interest, we used conventional seismic petrophysical methods in the workflow and found that the main driver modifying the elastic properties for the Avalon shales was TOC this conclusion serves as a foundation in integrated seismic inversion that may target lithofacies, TOC, and geomechanical properties. We then performed solid organic matter (TOC) substitution to account for variability of elastic properties and their contrasts as expressed in seismic amplitudes. A Class IV AVO response was seen at the top of the Avalon Formation, which is typical of an unconventional reservoir. We determined the layering and rock fabric anisotropy using empirical relationships or modeled in the rock property characterization process because reflectivity effects are often seen in the observed seismic used for well tie and wavelet estimation. Using calibrated RPM templates, we found that TOC is driving the elastic property variations in the Avalon Formation. In organic mudrock reservoirs, the computed TOC log was used as an input to compute porosity and calibrate rock-physics models (RPMs), which are needed for understanding the potential of source rocks or finding sweet spots and their contribution to the amplitude variation with offset (AVO) changes in the seismic data. TOC was calculated as a weighted average of Passey’s (empirical) and the bulk density-based (theoretical) methods. We used TOC estimation to aid the process of determining the best pay zones for development of such reservoirs. This includes accurate computation of mineral volumes, total organic carbon (TOC), porosity, and saturations. Petrophysical analysis of unconventional plays that are comprised of organic mudrock needs detailed data QC and preparation to optimize the results of quantitative interpretation.